remind me later close

Profile evaluation

Type of personality

Executive Editor: Marcelo Figari, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto General Editor: Daniel Buchbinder

Authors: Ricardo Cienfuegos, Carl-Peter Cornelius, Edward Ellis III, George Kushner

Mandible - Angle and ramus, complex - ORIF

back to CMF overview

Glossary

1 Principles top

The basal triangle decreases the bone buttressing and the interfragmentary support enlarge

Biomechanics

The basal triangle decreases the bone buttressing and the interfragmentary support. This condition demands a degree of stability beyond pure load sharing.

Basal triangle fractures through the mandibular angle therefore should be considered as comminuted fractures requiring load-bearing fixation across the basal triangle. This can be provided one of two ways:

Using a reconstruction plate or ...

The plate along the inferior border must be a heavy mandible plate enlarge

... using two plates, but the one along the inferior border must be a heavy mandible plate.

Sequence of plate insertion
The superior plate is inserted first in order to achieve preliminary fixation. This will prevent inadvertent displacement of the fragments during subsequent contouring and the insertion of the inferior border plate.

Choice of implant

Locking versus nonlocking plates
There are several advantages to a locking plate/screw system:

  1. Conventional plate/screw systems require precise adaptation of the plate to the underlying bone. Without this intimate contact, tightening of the screws will draw the bone segments toward the plate, resulting in alterations in the position of the osseous segments and the occlusal relationship. Locking plate/screw systems offer certain advantages over other plates in this regard; the most significant being that it becomes unnecessary for the plate to intimately contact the underlying bone in all areas. As the screws are tightened, they "lock" to the plate, thus stabilizing the segments without the need to compress the bone to the plate. This makes it impossible for the screw insertion to alter the reduction.
  2. Another potential advantage in locking plate/screw systems is that they do not disrupt the underlying cortical bone perfusion as much as conventional plates, which compress the undersurface of the plate to the cortical bone.
  3. A third advantage to the use of locking plate/screw systems is that the screws are unlikely to loosen from the plate. This means that even if a screw is inserted into a fracture gap, loosening of the screw will not occur. Similarly, if a bone graft is screwed to the plate, a locking head screw will not loosen during the phase of graft incorporation and healing. The possible advantage to this property of a locking plate/screw system is a decreased incidence of inflammatory complications due to loosening of the hardware.
    Locking plate/screw systems have been shown to provide more stable fixation than conventional nonlocking plate/screw systems.

Click here for a description of locking plate principles versus conventional plating.

Special considerations

Following special considerations may need to be taken into account:

Click on any subject for further detail.

2 Reduction top

The superior border of the fracture through the angle should also be reduced prior to placing them into MMF enlarge

Reduction of major fragments – applying MMF

Open reduction and stable internal fixation in dentate patients begins with fixation of the occlusion. Prior to placing the patient into MMF, the fracture should be exposed and any extractions deemed necessary performed. The superior border of the fracture through the angle should also be reduced prior to placing them into MMF.

Click here for further details on methods for applying MMF.

It is not necessary to have the basal triangle reduced at this stage.

A miniplate 2.0 is applied along the superior border of the fracture enlarge

Maintenance of reduction by application of a miniplate 2.0 at the superior border

A miniplate 2.0 is applied along the superior border of the fracture to maintain the alignment and reduction of the major fragments while the inferior border plate is adapted and applied.

The miniplate can be placed either on the lateral surface of the mandible or along the inside of the external oblique ridge similar to the treatment of a simple mandibular angle fracture.

A miniplate 2.0 is applied along the superior border of the fracture enlarge

Drill first screw hole

Hold the plate with an appropriate instrument (eg, periosteal elevator or forceps).

Use a 1.5 mm drill bit to drill through the plate hole next to the fracture line in the anterior fragment.

Insert a 2.0 mm screw of appropriate length enlarge

Insert first screw

Insert a 2.0 mm screw of appropriate length. Do not fully tighten it until the final reduction and plate position are confirmed.

Insert a 2.0 mm screw of appropriate length enlarge

Insert second screw

Insert a second screw in the hole next to the fracture line in the posterior fragment. The periosteal elevator is used now to keep the far end of the plate at the correct vertical level.
Tighten both screws.

Fill the remaining plate holes with screws enlarge

Additional screw placement

Fill the remaining plate holes with screws.

Bone screws inserted into the basal triangle function well as a handle on the fragment enlarge

Reduction of the basal triangle

The basal triangle itself must be repositioned by pushing and dragging it with an appropriate instrument. Bone screws inserted into the basal triangle function well as a handle on the fragment and are useful for reduction. Using a transoral approach, a small bone hook can be used to help position this fragment.

To keep the basal triangle in place it can be compressed between the greater fragments. An alternative is the preliminary fixation with a miniplate that will not interfere with the planned position of the inferior border plate.

3 Fixation top

Final result after removal of the superior border miniplate enlarge

Choice of implant for the inferior border plate

Only large profile plates meet the biomechanical requirements of basal triangle fractures.

One of the following plates should be considered for fixation at the inferior border. The chosen plate should allow for fixation of the basal triangle to the plate if large enough. This prevents the use of plates with a center space.

  • 6- to 8-hole medium profile locking plate 2.0
  • 6- to 8-hole large profile locking plate 2.0 (straight or prebent)
  • 6- to 8-hole extra large profile locking plate 2.0

The stability of universal fracture plates 2.4 is equal to the large profile plate from the locking plate 2.0 family.

Screw application is commonly bicortical.

Insert the properly contoured plate enlarge

Securing the plate to the bone using bone clamps

Insert the properly contoured plate onto the lateral surface of the mandible and hold it there using forceps.

Insert the properly contoured plate enlarge

Inserting screws

The sequence of screw insertion is not important if the plate is securely clamped to the bone. Drill guides should be used to center the screw within the plate hole.
For a step-by-step description follow this link.

Large fragments (like the triangular one in this illustration) can be secured to the plate to hold them in position. A locking head screw is a better choice for this purpose.

Final check

Release the MMF and check the occlusion for accuracy and the bony surfaces for precise anatomic reduction.

The incision is then closed in layers.

v1.0 2008-12-01