1 Principles topenlarge
Correct anatomical reduction is required to reproduce the original structure of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and the proper alignment of the orbital walls. In order to achieve proper reduction of the lateral orbital wall the greater wing of the sphenoid and the zygoma must be properly aligned. It is difficult to use the lateral orbital wall as a landmark if the fractures of the lateral orbital wall are comminuted.
The zygomatic arch can be useful in achieving the proper width of the midface and AP projection of the zygoma. It should be noted that the zygomatic arch is not a true arch and is often relatively straight in its central portion.
A goal is to restore the proper orbital volume and to restore the proper projections in all three dimensions. Accurate positioning of the zygomatic arch addresses the AP dimension and width of the midface.
It is possible that the periorbital contents may have been affected by the reduction of the zygomatic-complex fracture. A forced duction test should be performed before and after the reduction of the zygoma to make sure that the patient does not have entrapment of the soft tissues. Pre- and postoperative ophthalmologic exams should be considered in all patients who have sustained periorbital trauma.
Selection of approach
Three approaches are required for this procedure. They commonly include a intraoral maxillary vestibular approach, a lower-eyelid incision, and a coronal incision with direct exposure of the zygomatic arch and lateral orbital region.
The intraoral maxillary vestibular approach facilitates the exposure of the lateral buttress of the midface. It can also be used to expose the inferior orbital rim. The lateral maxillary vestibular approach can also be used to help reposition the depressed zygoma.
The lower-eyelid incision (transcutaneous or transconjunctival) is ideal for exposing the orbital floor, the orbital rim, and the lateral orbital wall.
The coronal incision is ideal for exposure of the zygomatic arch, lateral orbital rim (frontozygomatic suture), lateral wall of the orbit (sphenozygomatic suture), and can also be used to harvest split calvarial bone graft.
As a general principle with all plate fixation, at least two screws should be placed on both sides of the fracture. This often requires a plate with at least one extra screw hole to span the fracture. Ideally, the first screw should be placed on the side of the mobile fragment, and the plate used as a handle to close the gap and reduce the bone.
The first two screws should be placed in the plate holes closest to the fracture, one on each side of the fracture. Make sure that the fracture is adequately spanned so that each screw is placed in solid bone.
Order of reduction and fixation
In a fracture of this nature, the reduction and fixation of the zygoma, including the zygomatic arch, orbital rim, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress should be performed first. Reconstruction of the orbital floor should be performed after the zygoma has been reduced and fixated.
The first step should be the placement of a plate or wire at the frontozygomatic suture. If a plate is used, we recommend placing only one screw on each side of the fracture, allowing the zygoma to swing into its proper position for reduction. After the other plates and screws have been placed at the zygomatic arch, infraorbital rim, and zygomaticomaxillary buttress, the final screws can be placed in the frontozygomatic plate.
Using the 4-point technique it is controversial as to the proper order of placement of the second, third and fourth plate. The 4-point technique is unique from the 3-point technique in that the surgeon has visualization of the zygomatic arch. If the lateral wall of the orbit is not comminuted, this reference point is still singularly the most important landmark to determine whether a proper reduction has been performed. If this reference point is comminuted, the order of placement of the other three plates will be dependent on which landmarks are the least damaged. The zygomatic arch may be an excellent reference as to whether the proper AP projection of the midface has been restored. In cases where the arch has been fractured and displaced at several different levels, use of the arch to reposition the zygoma may be less reliable. A general principle is to begin with the reference points that are least comminuted. At the same time it is important to have wide exposure of all the reference points, and to recheck the reduction of each reference point as each new plate is placed.
Whenever possible the surgeon should try to achieve a perfect reduction of
the lateral wall of the orbit. This requires the alignment of the greater wing
of the sphenoid and the zygoma. This should be achievable if the lateral wall
is a simple fracture. When the lateral wall is comminuted, the lateral wall is
not so reliable as a landmark in determining the proper reduction of the
zygoma. In this situation the surgeon has to place higher emphasis in the
reduction of other sites. It would be unusual to have to place a mesh to
reconstruct the lateral wall of the zygoma, because the comminuted segments of
bone are supported by the temporalis muscle.
The size and strength of the plate along the zygomatic arch depends on the comminution and instability of the fracture. Extreme care should be taken during the dissection around the zygomatic arch so as not to injure the temporal branch of the facial nerve. This nerve lies very close to the periosteum of the zygomatic arch.
A smaller plate is recommended for the infraorbital rim. A larger plate (commonly an L-shaped plate) is recommended for the zygomaticomaxillary buttress.
Many surgeons argue that the potential cosmetic defects caused by a coronal approach to the zygomatic arch are worse than the defect of a minimally displaced arch. These cosmetic defects include alopecia from the coronal scar, risk of injury to the temporal branch of the facial nerve, and temporal hollowing.
Involvement of lateral orbital wall
Isolated lateral orbital wall fractures are rare and only occur after isolated trauma to this anatomical structure. Much more common is a lateral orbital wall fracture together with a zygoma fracture (as shown).
Displacement of the lateral orbital wall (with or without combined zygomatic complex fracture) directly affects the intraorbital volume (ie, inwards displacement results in exophthalmos whereas outward displacement results in enophthalmos). However, such globe displacements are camouflaged by posttraumatic swelling so that the above mentioned sequelae often become apparent only after swelling has decreased, which normally takes about 2 weeks.
Click here for detailed description of clinical and radiographic examination.
Clinical examination of the lateral orbital wall area is camouflaged by the overlying soft tissues. However, this CT scan nicely shows contour differences at the lateral orbital wall area.
Severely inward displaced lateral orbital wall fractures might require emergency treatment, if intraorbital pressure (due to displacement and/or intraorbital hematoma) is compromising optic nerve function (see axial CT scan).
Lateral orbital wall plate
Some surgeons recommend placement of a plate to reduce and fixate the lateral wall of the orbit between the greater wing of the sphenoid and the zygoma. This helps to guarantee a proper reduction of this fracture. It can only be used if there is no comminution of the lateral wall of the orbit. Placement of this plate is difficult because of necessary globe retraction. If a surgeon decides to position a plate in this location there is limited room, and often only one screw can be placed on each side of the fracture. If this plate is to be used, the authors recommend placing this as the second plate after the plate on the zygomaticofrontal suture.
This plate can be placed through the upper eyelid incision or if the fracture is not as posterior as in this illustration through the inferior eyelid incision.
2 Zygoma reduction methods topenlarge
The first step is to obtain the proper 3-D reduction of the zygoma using an elevator, hook, screw, or Carroll-Girard type device, or digital pressure can be used to mobilize the zygoma into its proper position.
The repositioning can be done through a transoral (Keen) incision, or directly through a coronal approach.
Illustration showing reduction being performed via a transoral (Keen) approach using an elevator.
Illustration shows the reduction performed via the coronal incision.
Alternative: screw and traction
A screw is inserted into the zygomatic bone through the skin or coronal incisions. This allows fracture reduction using the screw and a holding instrument.
Threaded reduction tool
A threaded reduction tool (Carroll-Girard screw) is inserted into the zygoma through the lower eyelid or coronal incisions and used for reduction.
3 Placement and fixation of first plate topenlarge
Placement of first plate
The first plate is placed across the frontozygomatic fracture area.
We recommend a minimum of a 5-hole plate with one hole spanning the fracture line. The plate should be properly adapted.
In this illustration, the first screw is placed in the unstable zygomatic fracture. An instrument is then used to pull the plate and zygomatic fragment in the cephalad direction to further reduce the fracture.
Fixation of first plate
Only one screw should be placed on each side of the fracture in the holes nearest to the fracture, until the surgeon has verified the proper 3-D reduction of the zygoma at the other two points. Looking through the upper eyelid incision, it is very difficult to determine the 3-D rotation of the zygoma.
While drilling holes in the periorbital area, it may be desirable to use a drill bit with a stop (commonly 6 mm stop).
The final two screws in the zygomaticofrontal plate should be placed at the end of the intervention.
4 Placement of additional plates topenlarge
Placement of second plate
Using the 4-point technique it is controversial as to the proper order of placement of the second, third, and fourth plate. The 4-point technique is different from the 3-point technique in that the surgeon has visualization of the zygomatic arch. If the lateral wall of the orbit is not comminuted, this reference point is still singularly the most important landmark to determine whether a proper reduction has been performed. If this reference point is comminuted, the order of placement of the other three plates will be dependent on which landmarks are the least destroyed. The zygomatic arch may be an excellent reference as to whether the proper AP projection of the midface has been restored. In cases where the arch has been fractured and displaced at several different levels, use of the arch to reposition the zygoma may be less reliable. A general principle is to begin with the reference points that are least comminuted. At the same time it is important to have wide exposure of all the reference points, and to recheck the reduction of each reference point as each new plate is placed.
Looking through the coronal incision the zygomatic plate should be properly adapted. Use a minimum of a 5-hole plate with the extra hole spanning the fracture line. Reconfirm that the zygomatic arch has been properly reduced prior to placing this plate. A minimum of two screws should be placed on each side of the fracture. Prior to securing this plate, make sure that the reference point of the lateral orbital wall, the inferior orbital rim, and the lateral maxillary buttress are properly reduced.
Placement of third plate
When looking through the lower eyelid incision, the orbital rim plate should be properly adapted. Use a minimum of a 5-hole plate with the extra hole spanning the fracture line. Reconfirm that the lateral orbital wall, and other reference points have been properly reduced prior to placing this plate. A minimum of two screws should be placed on each side of the fracture.
Placement of fourth plate
Looking through the maxillary vestibular approach, the fracture of the
zygomaticomaxillary buttress is aligned. A larger L-shaped plate is ideal for
the fixation of this fracture. This is the most difficult plate to properly
adapt in a zygoma fracture. It is important that the leg of the L-plate be
placed on the most lateral portion of the lateral maxillary buttress, where the
bone is fairly thick.
It is similarly important that the foot of the L-plate is placed along the alveolar bone in a manner that the screws will not be placed into the dental roots. A common problem with this third plate is failure to properly adapt the L-plate, resulting in screw placement into the thin wall of the anterior maxillary sinus. It is not uncommon for the lateral maxillary buttress to be comminuted. In this instance using a longer L-plate with multiple screw holes may be ideal.
We recommend that lower profile plates are used at the zygomaticofrontal suture and the infraorbital rim. A stronger plate is recommended for the zygomaticomaxillary buttress.
In the illustration we can see that there is a comminuted segment of the lateral column. This is a common presentation in this kind of fracture.
Options to consider for arch reconstruction
The illustration on the left represents a zygomatic arch fracture, where the
posterior fracture extends to the temporal bone. In a situation like this, with
fractures at multiple levels, a longer plate is needed.
In this case a lag technique was used to secure the posterior segment of the arch to the temporal bone. Extreme care needs to be used to make sure that the drill does not penetrate the calvaria, and does not violate the temporomandibular joint. A drill bit with stop is recommended. Click here for a detailed description of the lag technique.
There is a great deal of variability in the shape of the zygomatic arch. In this case, the arch is a relatively straight segment.
5 Reconstruction of the orbital floor defect topenlarge
If it was determined pre- or intraoperatively that orbital floor reconstruction is required, it is now performed.
The orbital floor defect is exposed by using orbital retractors and retractors on the lower eyelid.
(For a discussion on isolated orbital floor fractures, please click here.)
Many different devices have been used to facilitate retraction of the orbital contents, including malleable retractors, spoons, and special orbital retractors designed for the globe (as illustrated).
Cutting and bending
The mesh is cut, …
… all sharp edges of the plate are trimmed off to protect the soft tissues (note the shape of the fan has only a minimum number of screw holes), …
… and contoured to achieve the required shape, and accommodate key anatomical structures (nasolacrimal duct, infraorbital nerve, and optic nerve)
It is advisable not to extend the implant further posterior than 1 cm anterior to the optic canal entrance (if the posterior support to the orbit can be reached).
A sterile artificial skull allows a proper anatomical contour of the implant. This is not required when using a prebent mesh.
- When using the fan-shaped plate, the outer circumference of the mesh is widest in the area of the infraorbital rim. The mesh should be trimmed so that the outer circumference is as small as possible but still provides enough width to cover the defect.
- The necessity for screw fixation varies with the type of material used and nature of the fracture.
- It is important to use a plate large enough to span the entire defect.
Some surgeons have used the screw holes on a fan-shaped titanium plate as their fixation of the orbital rim. We recommend a complete reduction of the fracture at the orbital rim with fixation by a separate plate. (See description of second plate application).
The surgeon may chose to use one or more of the holes on the fan plate for fixation of the fan-shaped plate to the orbital rim or orbital floor (as illustrated). Generally, a single screw will suffice.
It is imperative that the fan-shaped plate spans the entire orbital defect to the most posterior portion of the orbital floor defect. Care should be taken to make sure that there is not any entrapment of soft tissues of the orbit during placement of the mesh plate. Following placement of the mesh plate, a forced duction test should be performed. Click here for a description of the forced duction test.
Alternatives to using the fan plate include:
Bone graft, porous polyethylene, titanium with porous polyethylene, pre-bent implant for orbital floor fractures, …
… or preformed orbital plates.
The advantage of bone graft is that the material is inexpensive. A disadvantage is that it takes additional time to harvest the bone graft and that there is an additional donor site.
Porous polyethylene has the advantage of being easy to work with and not having sharp barbs on the edges after being trimmed. It has the disadvantage of being invisible on postoperative radiological imaging.
A possible disadvantage is that drainage of orbital exudate may be compromised.
Screw fixation is controversial.
Titanium with porous polyethylene
Titanium with porous polyethylene has the combined advantages of being more rigid than porous polyethylene alone, and being less likely to have sharp barbs on the edges. It is visible on radiographic postoperative imaging.
A possible disadvantage is that drainage of orbital exudate may be compromised.
Screw fixation is controversial.
6 Postoperative examination topenlarge
Postoperative cone beam images show the position of a fan plate reconstructing the orbital floor and medial orbital wall in a coronal …
… and oblique parasagittal view in a patient with associated zygomatic-complex fracture.
Note: recontouring of the plate shown was accomplished by help of an intraoperative model. A standard fan plate can cover up to three wall of the orbit.