1 Decision making and strategies I top
The choice of an early single-stage versus a multiple-stage surgical approach is based on the individual situation. In general, a staged protocol is used for the majority of high-energy pilon fractures.
Displaced fractures with minimal, closed soft-tissue injury
(Tscherne classification, closed fracture grade 0, rarely grade 1)
When soft-tissue condition is optimal, reconstruction may be achieved by a single-stage open procedure, embracing the classical four steps of Rüedi and Allgöwer: Reconstruction of a fractured fibula followed by reconstruction of the tibial joint surface. Use of autogenous cancellous or corticocancellous bone graft (if necessary) and support by a buttress plate.
Significantly displaced fractures and/or fractures with severe, closed soft-tissue injury
(Tscherne classification, closed fracture grade 2 or 3)
It is generally advisable to proceed in two or more stages:
1) First stage: Closed reduction, fibular reduction and
stabilization, and joint bridging external fixation. Accurate reduction and
stabilization of the fibula re-establishes its proper length, alignment and
rotation. This assists with proper positioning of the posterolateral
tibial articular fragment (from the attachment of the posterior tibiofibular
ligaments) and, in turn, with reduction of the talus relative to the tibial
shaft. With complex fibular fractures, it may be better not to fix the fibula
in the first stage.
Joint spanning external fixation should be remote from the fracture. External fixation pins should avoid the planned future surgical approaches including the neck of the talus.
2) Second stage: Definitive open reconstruction after 5-21 days. Definitive operative treatment of the articular surface should be delayed until the soft tissues have recovered sufficiently to allow definitive reconstruction. Return of skin wrinkles is a good sign of soft-tissue recovery.
Open pilon fractures
These are often very severe injuries that may require plastic surgery for soft-tissue reconstruction. The management includes several stages:
1) Emergency management: Wound debridement and lavage. Fibular stabilization and fixation (if needed and the soft tissues allow). Joint-bridging external fixation.
2) Second stage (within 48 - 72 hours): Soft-tissue coverage (local or free flap). Reconstruction of the tibial articular surface may be possible at the same time and should be considered if the exposure for flap coverage allows.
3) Third stage: Definitive stabilization between the articular segment (joint block) and tibial shaft by internal fixation (or external fixator) is typically delayed until soft-tissue recovery has occurred. However, this may be performed at the time of flap coverage in certain circumstances.
2 Decision making and strategies II topenlarge
The integrity and condition of the soft tissue envelope, the fracture characteristics, and the available implants will all influence the choice of surgical approach.
3-part articular fractures typically involve posterolateral, anterolateral, and medial components. Ligamentous attachments are usually intact. They are the posterior tibiofibular ligament (posterolateral fragment), the anterior tibiofibular ligament (anterolateral fragment), and the deltoid ligament (medial fragment).
The fibula is another essential component. Its anatomical reduction is essential if posterolateral and anterolateral tibial articular fragments are to be reducible. Fibular malreduction is a pitfall, particularly during emergency fixation of complex fractures.
Anteromedial or anterolateral approach?
Most tibial pilon fractures are best approached anteriorly, either anteromedially or anterolaterally. The size of the anterolateral fragment helps determine the optimal approach. When it is large, and its medial fracture plane is at or near the medial malleolus, an anteromedial approach is recommended. When the anterolateral fragment is smaller, and the fracture crosses the articular margin more laterally, its reduction can be achieved with an anterolateral approach.
For open fractures with the commonly observed associated transverse medial traumatic wound at the distal tibia (see illustration), an anterolateral surgical approach may be preferable to minimize additional dissection beneath the medial traumatized skin. Similarly, a distal tibial fracture with an associated lateral traumatic open wound may be best approached anteromedially. The anticipated incision(s) for ORIF should be considered during initial debridement and external fixation, even though definitive fixation is delayed until soft tissues recover.
Injury radiographic evaluation and its influence on approach and implants
The choice of implants in a 3-part articular fracture is dependent on the associated metaphyseal comminution, the surgical approach, and the soft tissue envelope as previously described. The associated metaphyseal comminution should be considered and assessed on the injury radiographs. With bending fractures, comminution occurs on the side that fails in compression. Tension failure typically produces a simple transverse fracture plain.
For pilon fractures with a varus deformity, medial metaphyseal comminution is commonly observed and medial buttress plating with a stronger medial implant is necessary. An anteromedial approach is preferable for its application.
For pilon fractures with a valgus deformity, lateral metaphyseal comminution is commonly observed and the medial distal tibia typically fails in tension. In these patterns, lateral or anterolateral buttressing is optimal and medial fixation can be less strong.
Thus, for a pilon with significant initial valgus and lateral and/or anterolateral metaphyseal comminution, an anterolateral approach permits optimal placement of a buttress plate.
The use of locking plates
The choice of whether to use a locking implant is determined by the expected healing time, the surgical approach, and the need for additional compression at the articular surface at the time of reduction. In general, locking implants are unnecessary if plates are placed anterolaterally and medially. Fracture comminution may indicate the need for such supplementary plate fixation.
However, if the associated soft-tissue envelope contraindicates the use of supplementary plate fixation, use of an angular stable (locking) implant may help prevent late deformity and should be considered.
Use of locking plates may also improve stabilization of osteoporotic fractures. Another alternative is supplementary external fixation.
3 Decision making and strategies III topenlarge
Articular comminution and impaction
There are multiple commonly observed articular injuries that increase the complexity of 43-C fractures from the 3-part injury described. These include the presence of articular comminution and impaction. Impaction is frequently seen centrally and medially.
Articular surface impaction is important to identify and correct. Direct access to the impacted area must be provided through the chosen surgical approach.
Medial comminution and impaction
Medial comminution and impaction is frequently seen in pilon fractures with a predominant varus deformity. The two typical locations are at the lateral aspect of the medial malleolus and at the medial aspect of the anterolateral fragment.
Medial articular comminution is optimally visualized through an anteromedial approach. In addition to reduction of the associated comminution of the medial malleolus, this approach allows for reduction of the impaction seen at the medial aspect of the anterolateral fragment. An osteotome or elevator can be used to disimpact the articular surface and bone graft can be placed above the articular surface.
The enlarged illustration shows an impacted area of articular surface on the anterolateral fragment, its reduction against the talus with an elevator, and after bone graft placement.
Lateral comminution and impaction
Lateral comminution and impaction is frequently seen in pilon fractures with a predominant valgus deformity. Lateral articular comminution can be approached through either an anteromedial or anterolateral approach. Visualization may be optimal with an anterolateral approach that allows for external rotation of the anterolateral fragment and direct reduction of the associated comminution.
4 Application of a distractor topenlarge
Application of a distractor intraoperatively greatly assists with articular visualization. Additionally, the distractor helps to align several of the major articular fragments. We typically replace a temporary joint bridging external fixator with a distractor during definitive articular surface reduction and fixation.
To apply the distractor laterally, place a 4 mm Schanz pin transversely from lateral to medial into the talar neck, through the surgical incision. A second 4 mm Schanz pin is placed from lateral to medial into the tibial shaft, proximal to the intended plate. The distal pin, anterior to the axis of rotation of the talus, produces ankle joint distraction and plantarflexion, maximizing articular visualization. Place the threaded rod of the distractor posterolaterally, away from the incision.
The course of the anterior compartment neurovascular bundle, and also the superficial peroneal nerve, should be considered during pin placement. Thus the proximal pin should be placed in the anterior half of the tibia. It is important to use blunt dissection and the appropriate soft-tissue protection sleeves during pin placement.
5 Reduction of articular fragments topenlarge
Cleaning of the fracture site
Rotate the anterolateral fragment externally on the anterior tibiofibular ligamentous hinge to allow visualization of the remaining articular segments. The fracture can then be cleaned of early callus and hematoma.
Derotation and preliminary fixation of the posterolateral fragment
The commonly observed dorsiflexion deformity of the posterolateral fragment must first be corrected.
Place two small (2.5 mm) threaded pins or two K-wires directly into the exposed anterior cancellous surface of the posterolateral fragment. Use them as joysticks to correct the dorsiflexion and posterior translation of the posterolateral fragment.
Secure the posterolateral fragment with strategically placed small (1.25 mm) K-wires. They can be placed from either the anterior tibia into the posterolateral segment,…
…or from the fibula into the posterolateral segment,…
Reduction and preliminary fixation of the medial fragment
Similarly, place two 1.25 mm K-wires as joysticks into the medial fragment. Reduce it against the posterolateral fragment. In this step, the medial K-wires do not yet extend into the posterolateral fragment.
Alternatively make two small stab incisions and place a large pointed Weber clamp from the posterolateral fragment to the medial fragment. Engage the posterolateral fragment just above the ankle joint, between peroneal tendons and the Achilles tendon.
Stabilize the medial and posterolateral fragments with 1.25 mm K-wires inserted percutaneously, through the medial fragment and into the posterolateral fragment. New K-wires may be used, or the previously placed joysticks may be advanced. Place these wires such that they do not interfere with the more anterior reductions.
Reduction and preliminary fixation of the anterolateral fragment
Rotate the anterolateral fragment internally to complete the reduction of the pilon. This can be accomplished with dental picks and a large Weber clamp, placed from the posterolateral fragment to the anterolateral fragment.
The anterolateral fragment reduction can be confirmed cortically at the junctions with the medial fragment and the intact tibia. The reduction is confirmed at the articular surface using direct visualization.
Stabilize the reduction with additional 1.25 mm K-wires placed from the anterolateral fragment into the posterolateral segment.
Initial attempts at reduction of the articular surface are often unsuccessful. Careful assessment is necessary. Malreduction must be corrected prior to definitive fixation.
Revision requires re-displacement of the anterolateral fragment. Displacement of the posterolateral and medial segments, typically in the sagittal plane, may also require correction. This process is repeated over and over until the fracture is reduced. (See also assessment of reduction.)
6 Lag screw fixation topenlarge
Before plate fixation, small lag screws can be placed between the major articular fragments. Small cruciate head 2.4 mm cortical screws may be advantageous as they do not interfere with the anticipated plate placement. Special extra-long screws will be necessary. The K-wires can be removed if stable compression of the articular fragments is obtained.
Alternatively, leave the K-wires in place and proceed directly to plate application.
7 Plate fixation top
In C-type fractures, definitive internal fixation often includes lateral and medial plate fixation which span from the articular block to the tibial diaphysis. The distractor may need to be removed to allow plate placement. Additionally, plantarflexion of the foot is frequently necessary.
Options to consider include the number of plates as well as their stiffness, strength, and location. Comminuted areas and osteoporotic fractures may benefit from supplementary plates. If the fibula remains unstable, more stable tibial fixation may be advisable.
Choice of implant
The specific implant is less important than the reduction and the plate function. Non-locking buttressing implants can be used for the majority of pilon fractures. Angular stable fixation, using locking head screws, may avoid the need for a second plate and may reduce the need for bone grafting.
A precontoured L-shaped anterolateral plate (locking or not) may be the ideal implant for the anterolateral approach. If an anterolateral locking plate is used, an additional medial plate may not be necessary. However, if the anterolateral plate is no locking plate, an additional medial buttressing implant is often necessary.
Precontoured plates may often be used without adjustments. However, conventional straight plates must be contoured to fit the bone.
Application of the lateral plate
The plate is slid submuscularly along the lateral cortex of the tibia, deep to the anterior compartment musculature and neurovascular bundle, and anterior to the interosseous membrane.
If lag screws are in place and reduction is stable, the distractor can be removed prior to sliding in the lateral plate in order to facilitate plate placement. However, if the distractor is necessary to maintain length and alignment of the articular block, it may be advisable to leave the distractor in place during plate placement.
Care must be taken during plate placement to ensure that the plate is slid directly against the tibia to avoid damage to the neurovascular bundle.
Distal screw placement in lateral plate
Distally screws are placed from anterior to posterior engaging the major articular fragments. The lateral fluoroscopic image is used to ensure safe, extraarticular screw placements. The number and location of the distal screws is determined by the fracture pattern.
Proximal screw placement in lateral plate
Proximally a separate incision (4-6 cm in length) is placed 1 cm lateral to the tibial crest to allow plate adjustment and proximal screw placements.
Fixation of the medial side
Depending on the fracture configuration and location, medial fixation will consist of either
- subcutaneous medial buttress plating,
- or combinations thereof.
The medial plate can be slid subcutaneously through a small (2 cm) incision. The screws through the plate can be inserted through small stab incisions. An additional long surgical exposure of the medial tibia should be avoided.
Prior to closure, reduction and stability must be reconfirmed (see also assessment of reduction). The joint arthrotomy is repaired. It is imperative that the extensor retinaculum is also repaired to prevent bowstringing of the extensor tendons. The skin is closed with interrupted 3-0 nilon sutures placed in a modified Allgöwer-Donati fashion (Dietz UA, Kuhfuss I, Debus ES, Thiede A (2006) Mario Donati and the vertical mattress suture of the skin. World J Surg; 30(2):141-148).
8 Case example topenlarge
This 32-year old male sustained an injury to his left leg after a fall from height. The injury-radiographs demonstrate tibial shortening. The fibula is intact. The usual three articular fragments – anterolateral, posterolateral and medial – are shown.
Initial management consisted of temporary spanning external fixation to allow recovery of the soft-tissue swelling. A CT scan was obtained after external fixation to allow for an accurate assessment of the articular injury.
An anterolateral surgical exposure was used. Intraoperative articular visualization was optimized with a distractor spanning from the mid-tibia to the talar neck. Preliminary articular reduction was obtained and K-wires were placed.
Small cortical lag screws were used to maintain the reduction and to allow for removal of the K-wires.
Definitive plate fixation consisted of an anterolateral non-locking plate combined with a medial non-locking plate. Both implants were placed through limited incisions using minimally invasive techniques. Proximal screw fixations were placed through small incisions.
9 Pearl - Fixation of fractures with proximal extension topenlarge
Fractures with proximal diaphyseal extensions
In selected fracture patterns with a long oblique proximal extension of the posterior, or posterolateral articular fragment, early fixation of this fracture component may be advantageous. Early callus on the large fracture surface may hinder delayed reduction of such fragments.
Early fixation of such an articular fragment with long proximal extension, effectively converts a 43-C pattern into a 43-B pattern, simplifying the delayed articular reconstruction.
Plating the proximal extension
The CT-scan demonstrates where the fracture is located proximally on the posterior tibial surface. This area is exposed through a posteromedial approach. The fracture can be stabilized with lag screws, an antiglide plate, or combinations thereof.
In the illustrated case, fixation of the posterior fragment was performed acutely through a limited posteromedial approach at the time of initial bridging external fixation.
Definitive reconstruction of the articular surface is delayed until the soft tissues allow. The surgical approach and implants are determined based on the remaining fracture configuration.
In the illustrated case, definitive articular reconstruction of the anterior fractures was delayed for 16 days.